General
Lucille WATTERS, Plaintiff in Error, v. HOME INVESTMENT & SAVINGS COMPANY, Defendant in Error
12 F.2d 1022·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1926
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Lucille WATTERS, Plaintiff in Error, v. HOME INVESTMENT & SAVINGS COMPANY, Defendant in Error.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
May 17, 1926.)
No. 293.
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
Leo Oppenheimer, of New York City (M. P. Kupfer, of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff in error.
Satterlee & Canfield, of New York City, (R. R. Hicks and Thomas F. Compton, both of New York City, of counsel), for defendant in error.
Before HOUGH, MANTON, and MACK, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.