Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
George E. Tucker, Respondent, v. Emory W. Abbott, Impleaded, etc., Appellant, 1890 — 125 N.Y. 699 · caselaw · US
General
George E. Tucker, Respondent, v. Emory W. Abbott, Impleaded, etc., Appellant
125 N.Y. 699·New York Court of Appeals·1890·NY
All concur, except Eabl, J., not voting.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
George E. Tucker, Respondent, v. Emory W. Abbott, Impleaded, etc., Appellant.
(Argued December 4, 1890;
decided December 16, 1890.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, made May 1, 1888, "which reversed a judgment in favor of defendant and granted a new trial.
V. P. Abbott for appellant.
O. IT. Walts for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm order, and judgment absolute ordered for plaintiff on stipulation; no opinion.
All concur, except Eabl, J., not voting.
Order affirmed and judgment accordingly.