Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
BUCK et ux. v. NEW JERSEY by the STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSIONER, 1968 — 389 U.S. 571 · caselaw · US
General
BUCK et ux. v. NEW JERSEY by the STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSIONER
389 U.S. 571·Supreme Court of the United States·1968
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
BUCK et ux. v. NEW JERSEY by the STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSIONER.
No. 817.
Decided January 15, 1968.
James T. Dowd for appellants.
Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General of New Jersey, and Elias Abelson and Edward D. McKirdy, Deputy Attorneys General, for appellee.
[MAJORITY — Per Cukiam.]
Per Cukiam.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.