Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Augustin DERBY, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of the Estate of Louis Piesachowitz, Nathan Piesachowitz, Jacob Piesachowitz, and Meyer Piesachowitz, Individually and as Copartners Trading under the Firm Name and Style of Piesachowitz Bros., Bankrupts, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Joseph GLUCK, Abnor Gluck, and Nathan Kasinitz, Copartners Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Joseph Gluck & Co., Defendants-Respondents, 1925 — 8 F.2d 1019 · caselaw · US
Bankruptcy
Augustin DERBY, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of the Estate of Louis Piesachowitz, Nathan Piesachowitz, Jacob Piesachowitz, and Meyer Piesachowitz, Individually and as Copartners Trading under the Firm Name and Style of Piesachowitz Bros., Bankrupts, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Joseph GLUCK, Abnor Gluck, and Nathan Kasinitz, Copartners Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Joseph Gluck & Co., Defendants-Respondents
8 F.2d 1019·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1925
Before ROGERS, HOUGH, and MAN-TON, Circuit Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Augustin DERBY, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of the Estate of Louis Piesachowitz, Nathan Piesachowitz, Jacob Piesachowitz, and Meyer Piesachowitz, Individually and as Copartners Trading under the Firm Name and Style of Piesachowitz Bros., Bankrupts, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Joseph GLUCK, Abnor Gluck, and Nathan Kasinitz, Copartners Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Joseph Gluck & Co., Defendants-Respondents.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
October 20, 1925.)
No. 24.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Hew York.
Silver & Moskowitz, of Hew York City (Bumstine & Goist and George E. Hotter, both of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiif.
Shaino & Weinrib, of New York City (George C. Levin, of New York City, on the .brief), for defendants-respondents.
Before ROGERS, HOUGH, and MAN-TON, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Decree affirmed.