Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Mary A. Van Zandt, as General Guardian of Harry C. Van Zandt, Respondent, v. John H. Grant et al., Appellants, 1902 — 170 N.Y. 621 · caselaw · US
General
Mary A. Van Zandt, as General Guardian of Harry C. Van Zandt, Respondent, v. John H. Grant et al., Appellants
170 N.Y. 621·New York Court of Appeals·1902·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Mary A. Van Zandt, as General Guardian of Harry C. Van Zandt, Respondent, v. John H. Grant et al., Appellants.
Reported below, 56 App. Div. 176.
(Argued March 24, 1902;
decided April 8, 1902.)
Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 19, 1900, modifying and affirming as modified a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court at a Trial Term without a jury.
The motion was made upon the ground that the Court of Appeals has no jurisdiction to entertain the appeal, no questions of law being involved therein, and the decision of the Appellate Division having been unanimous.
Meh)vn G. Palliser for motion.
Pierre 0. Talmcm opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.