General
Empire City Savings Bank, Appellant, v. Henry G. Silleck, Jr., et al., Defendants. Moise Geismann, Respondent
180 N.Y. 541·New York Court of Appeals·1905·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Empire City Savings Bank, Appellant, v. Henry G. Silleck, Jr., et al., Defendants. Moise Geismann, Respondent.
Empire City Savings Bank v. Silleck, 98 App. Div. 139, affirmed.
(Argued January 11, 1905;
decided January 31, 1905.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court- in the first judicial department, entered December 3, 1904, which reversed an order of Special Term denying a motion of the respondent herein to be relieved from his bid made at a mortgage foreclosure sale had in the above-entitled action and granted said motion.
Joseph E. Bullen and Charles W. Dayton for appellant.
Isaac Moss for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Yann and Werner, JJ.