Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Estate of Theodore Scheideler, Deceased, 1894 — 142 N.Y. 668 · caselaw · US
General
In the Matter of the Estate of Theodore Scheideler, Deceased
142 N.Y. 668·New York Court of Appeals·1894·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Estate of Theodore Scheideler, Deceased.
(Argued April 23, 1894;
decided May 4, 1894.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, made January 12, 1894, which affirmed an order of the surrogate of the city and county of New York directing payment of a legacy under the will of Theodore Scheideler, deceased.
John Braden for appellant.
Hew/ry Schmitt for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Order affirmed.