Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Victrylite Candle Co. et al. v. United States, 1954 — 348 U.S. 820 · caselaw · US
General
Victrylite Candle Co. et al. v. United States
348 U.S. 820·Supreme Court of the United States·1954
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 101.
Victrylite Candle Co. et al. v. United States.
Edward Brodkey, Frank E. Gettleman, Arthur Gettleman and Horace A. Young for the Victrylite Candle Co., petitioner.
Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Olney, Beatrice Rosenberg and Robert G. Maysack for the United States.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.