Contracts · MBE-tested
Federal Power Commission v. Pan American Petroleum Corp. et al.
389 U.S. 1002·Supreme Court of the United States·1967
Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 227.
Federal Power Commission v. Pan American Petroleum Corp. et al.
Cecil N. Cook and Neal Powers, Jr., for respondent Cockrell et al., Bruce R. Merrill and Thomas H. Burton for respondent Continental Oil Co., and Cecil E. Munn for respondent General American Oil Co. of Texas on the motion.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 10th Cir. Motion for consecutive oral arguments denied. (See ante, p. 811, where consolidation ordered and certiorari granted in No. 60 et al.)
Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.