Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
A. Perry Harrington et al., Respondents, v. William Clark, Appellant, 1880 — 82 N.Y. 607 · caselaw · US
General
A. Perry Harrington et al., Respondents, v. William Clark, Appellant
82 N.Y. 607·New York Court of Appeals·1880·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
A. Perry Harrington et al., Respondents, v. William Clark, Appellant.
(Submitted June 17, 1880 ;
decided September 21, 1880.)
Decided on the facts in the case.
Amos H. Prescott for appellant.
Leon Talcott for respondents.
[MAJORITY — Earl, J.,]
Earl, J.,
reads for affirmance.
All concur, except Finch, J., absent at argument.
Judgment affirmed.