Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Martin vs. Wilson, 1848 — 1 N.Y. 240 · caselaw · US
General
Martin vs. Wilson
1 N.Y. 240·New York Court of Appeals·1848·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Martin vs. Wilson.
Where after affirmance of the judgment of the Court below, a remittitur has been sent to and filed with the Clerk of that' Court, this Court loses jurisdiction of the cause, so that it cannot open a default therein.
O. W. Sturtevant, for the plaintiff in error moved to open a judgment of affirmance by default in this case at the last January term, and read affidavits' excusing the default.
J. 3. Magher, for the defendant in error, read an affidavit showing.that a remittitur had been issued and duly filed in «the Supreme Court.
[MAJORITY — The Court]
The Court
held that it lost jurisdiction of the cause when the remittitur was filed in the Court below, and on that ground
Denied the motion.