Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Snowden et al. v. United States; Posey et al. v. United States; and Bowers v. United States, 1970 — 397 U.S. 946 · caselaw · US
General
Snowden et al. v. United States; Posey et al. v. United States; and Bowers v. United States
397 U.S. 946·Supreme Court of the United States·1970
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 946,
Misc.
No. 1000,
Misc.
No. 1021,
Misc.
Snowden et al. v. United States; Posey et al. v. United States; and Bowers v. United States.
H. C. Mike Watkins- for petitioners Snowden et al. in No. 946, Mise., and Herman W. Alford and Laurel G. Weir for petitioners in No. 1000, Mise. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Leonard, John M. Rosenberg, and Robert A. Murphy for the United States in all three cases.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Reported below: 416 F. 2d 545.