Contracts · MBE-tested
United States v. Palladino et al.
413 U.S. 916·Supreme Court of the United States·1973
Mr. Justice Douglas would deny certiorari. Mr. Justice Brennan, joined by Mr. Justice Stewart and Mr. Justice Marshall, would grant the petition, vacate the judgment, and remand case for further proceedings not inconsistent with his dissent in Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, ante, p. 73. See Miller v. California, ante, p. 47.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 72-1446.
United States v. Palladino et al.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Miller v. California, ante, p. 15; Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, ante, p. 49; Kaplan v. California, ante, p. 115; United States v. 12 200-ft. Reels Film, ante, p. 123; United States v. Orito, ante, p. 139; Heller v. New York, ante, p. 483; Roaden v. Kentucky, ante, p. 496; and Alexander v. Virginia, ante, p. 836.
Mr. Justice Douglas would deny certiorari. Mr. Justice Brennan, joined by Mr. Justice Stewart and Mr. Justice Marshall, would grant the petition, vacate the judgment, and remand case for further proceedings not inconsistent with his dissent in Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, ante, p. 73. See Miller v. California, ante, p. 47.