Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
UNITED STATES v. BETHLEHEM STEEL CO. et al., 1968 — 389 U.S. 575 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
UNITED STATES v. BETHLEHEM STEEL CO. et al.
389 U.S. 575·Supreme Court of the United States·1968
Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
UNITED STATES v. BETHLEHEM STEEL CO. et al.
No. 130.
Decided January 15, 1968.
Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Sanders, Alan S. Rosenthal and Martin Jacobs for the United States.
David R. Owen for Bethlehem Steel Co. and William A. Grimes for Moran Towing & Transportation Co., Inc., respondents.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgments of the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit are vacated and the cause is remanded to that court for further proceedings in light of this Court’s decision in Wyandotte Transportation Co. v. United States, ante, p. 191.
Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.