Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Douglas Company, Appellant, v. A. F. Stone, Late Treasurer, etc., 1903 — 191 U.S. 557 · caselaw · US
General
Douglas Company, Appellant, v. A. F. Stone, Late Treasurer, etc.
191 U.S. 557·Supreme Court of the United States·1903
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 10.
Douglas Company, Appellant, v. A. F. Stone, Late Treasurer, etc.
Argued October 13, 1903.
Decided October 19, 1903.
Mr. Daniel Trigg and Mr. J. H. Gilmore for appellant.
Mr. William A. Anderson for appellee.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Virginia.
Per Curiam.
Decree affirmed with costs, on the authority of Holt v. Indiana Manufacturing Company, 176 U. S. 68; Fishhook v. Western Union Telegraph Company, 161 U. S. 96, and cases cited.