Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Osslo et al. v. California, 1958 — 357 U.S. 907 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Osslo et al. v. California
357 U.S. 907·Supreme Court of the United States·1958
The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 961.
Osslo et al. v. California.
Aaron Sapiro and Charles P. Scully for petitioners. Edmund G. Brown, Attorney General of California, and William E. James and Norman H. Sokolow, Deputy Attorneys General, for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Supreme Court of California. Certiorari denied. Bail having been temporarily granted in this case by Mr. Justice Douglas on April 29, 1958, it is ordered that said order continue until June 23, 1958, and then terminate.
The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.