Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Albert T. Porter, Respondent, v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America, Appellant, 1901 — 168 N.Y. 633 · caselaw · US
Civil Procedure · MBE-tested
Albert T. Porter, Respondent, v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America, Appellant
168 N.Y. 633·New York Court of Appeals·1901·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Albert T. Porter, Respondent, v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America, Appellant.
Porter v. Prudential Ins. Co. of Ar.ieriea, 63 App. Div. 619, appeal dismissed.
(Argued September 30, 1901;
decided October 4, 1901.)
Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered August 7, 1901, affirming a judgment in, favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court at a Trial -Term without a jury.
The motion was made upon the ground that the judgment of affirmance was unanimous and not appealable to the Court of Appeals.
Lewis E. Carr for motion.
Won. 0. Campbell opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs.