Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
UNDERHILL v. PATTON, 1870 — 154 U.S. 575 · caselaw · US
General
UNDERHILL v. PATTON
154 U.S. 57519 L. Ed. 882·Supreme Court of the United States·1870
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
UNDERHILL v. PATTON.
ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS.
No. 199.
Argued April 25, 1870.
Decided April 30, 1870.
Little v. Herndon, 10 Wall. 26, followed.
Long v. Patton, ante, 573, followed.
The ease is stated in the opinion.
[MAJORITY — Mr. Justice Nelson]
Mr. Justice Nelson
delivered the opinion of the court.
This is a writ of error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois.
The suit in ejectment was brought by Mrs. Patton against Under-hill, in the court below, to recover possession of the south half of section 22, township 27 north, range 13 west.
Mr. B. C. Ooolc for plaintiff in error.
Mr. Conway Robinson for defendant in error.
All the questions in this case are disposed of in the cases of Little v. Herndon, 10 Wall. 26, and Long v. Patton, ante, 573.
Judgment affirmed.