Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Paul M. Herzog, as Receiver for the Benefit of Creditors of Joseph Ryan, Appellant, v. Municipal Electric Light Company, Respondent, 1904 — 180 N.Y. 518 · caselaw · US
General
Paul M. Herzog, as Receiver for the Benefit of Creditors of Joseph Ryan, Appellant, v. Municipal Electric Light Company, Respondent
180 N.Y. 518·New York Court of Appeals·1904·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Paul M. Herzog, as Receiver for the Benefit of Creditors of Joseph Ryan, Appellant, v. Municipal Electric Light Company, Respondent.
Herzog v. Municipal Hleciric Light Co., 89 App. Div. 569, affirmed.
(Argued December 5, 1904;
decided December 30, 1904.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered January 15, 1904, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term.
Louis Marshall and S. F. Kneeland for appellant.
Paul D. Cravath and William F. Sheehan, for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien and Haight, JJ. Dissenting: Bartlett, Martin and Vann, JJ.