Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Petition of LONGO, 1927 — 21 F.2d 968 · caselaw · US
Tax
Petition of LONGO
21 F.2d 968·United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan·1927
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Petition of LONGO.
District Court, E. D. Michigan.
September 19, 1927.
No. 16326.
Aliens @=>62(5) — Declaration of intention as basis for naturalization can be made only by legal resident of United States.
Declaration of intention as basis for petition for naturalization can be legally made by an alien only when he is legally a resident of the United States.
Naturalization Proceeding. Petition of Antonio Longo for naturalization.
Denied.
[MAJORITY — TUTTLE, District Judge.]
TUTTLE, District Judge.
The petition for naturalization No. 16326 of Antonio Lon-go, filed with this court on August 5, 1926, came on regularly for hearing on September 19,1927. The following facts were presented to the court:
(1) The petitioner was bom in Italy, May 27, 1894.
(2) Petitioner landed in the United States some time in 1919. He did not, upon his arrival in this country,' comply with the immigration laws requiring him to submit himself for inspection as an immigrant and to pay a head tax.
(3) On October 6, 1919, he declared his intention to become a citizen.
(4) On March 9,1921, for the first time, he paid a head tax, was inspected by immigration officials, and secured a legal entrance into the United States.
The court hqlds that, since this petitioner did not secure a legal entrance into the United States for permanent residence purposes until March 9, 1921, his declaration of intention, dated October 6,1919, is invalid and insufficient upon which to basea petition for naturalization. Under the law, it seems apparent that a declaration of intention can be made legally by an alien only when he is legally a resident of the United States. In re Connal (D. C.) 8 F.(2d) 374; In re Jensen (D. C.) 11 F.(2d) 414.
Petition denied.