Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Fred M. Shanklin, Appellant, v. Charles A. Brown et al., Respondents, 1907 — 189 N.Y. 526 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Fred M. Shanklin, Appellant, v. Charles A. Brown et al., Respondents
189 N.Y. 526·New York Court of Appeals·1907·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Fred M. Shanklin, Appellant, v. Charles A. Brown et al., Respondents.
Bhanldin v. Brown, 103 Ajjp. Div. 473, affirmed.
(Argued June 7, 1907;
decided October 1, 1907.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered August 19, 1905, affirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a verdict directed by the court and an order
denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover for an alleged breach of contract.
Philo P. Safford for appellant.
John Burlinson Coleman for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Yann, Willard Bartlett and Hisoocic, JJ. Absent: Haight, J.