Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Louis Bourdon, Respondent, v. Francis A. Martin, as Receiver, etc., Appellant, 1894 — 142 N.Y. 669 · caselaw · US
General
Louis Bourdon, Respondent, v. Francis A. Martin, as Receiver, etc., Appellant
142 N.Y. 669·New York Court of Appeals·1894·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Louis Bourdon, Respondent, v. Francis A. Martin, as Receiver, etc., Appellant.
(Argued April 23, 1894;
decided May 4, 1894.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, made December 6, 1893, which affirmed an order of the Special Term directing the defendant personally to pay the costs of this action.
J. IF. Atkinson for appellant.
Thomas O' Oonnor for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Order affirmed. .