General
Leonard Vogel et al., Respondents, v. Valentine F. Whitmore et al., Appellants, Impleaded with Lyman M. Otis et al., Respondents
149 N.Y. 595·New York Court of Appeals·1896·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Leonard Vogel et al., Respondents, v. Valentine F. Whitmore et al., Appellants, Impleaded with Lyman M. Otis et al., Respondents.
Vogel v. Whitmore, 73 Hun, 417, affirmed.
(Argued April 29, 1896 ;
decided May 26, 1896.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, entered October 26, 1893, which affirmed a judgment entered upon a decision of the court on trial „ at Special Term in an action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien,, distributing the sum of $4,391.58 among the various parties to the action.
Peter H. Van Auken for appellants.
Fred. E. Drake for respondents Otis and Moody.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs on opinion below.
All concur, except Haight, J., not sitting.