Securities
Scott QUEENSEN, Respondent, v. JERRY BICKEL RACE CARS, INC., Appellant, and Division of Employment Security, Respondent.
571 S.W.3d 245·Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO·2019·MO
Before Philip M. Hess, P.J., and Robert G. Dowd, Jr., J., and Mary K. Hoff, J.
Brief incoming
Source-anchored Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Scott QUEENSEN, Respondent,
v.
JERRY BICKEL RACE CARS, INC., Appellant,
and
Division of Employment Security, Respondent.
No. ED 107096
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
FILED: April 9, 2019
ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: Cynthia Marie Davenport, 104 Professional Parkway, PO Box 336, Troy, MO 63379, DAVENPORT LAW.
ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT: Scott Queensen, Acting Pro Se, 14720 Madison Lane, Wright City, MO 63390-5535, DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, Todd Anthony Scott, Bart Anton Matanic, Co-Counsel, 421 E. Dunklin, PO Box 59, Jefferson City, MO 65104.
Before Philip M. Hess, P.J., and Robert G. Dowd, Jr., J., and Mary K. Hoff, J.
ORDER
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM]
PER CURIAM
Jerry Bickel Race Cars, Inc. ("Employer") appeals from the order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission ("Commission") finding Scott Queensen was not disqualified from unemployment benefits after his termination from Employer because of misconduct connected with work. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. The evidence in support of the Commission's order was not insufficient. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the Commission's order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).