Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
C. I. T. CORPORATION, Intervener, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee, 1931 — 53 F.2d 979 · caselaw · US
Corporations
C. I. T. CORPORATION, Intervener, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee
53 F.2d 979·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·1931
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
C. I. T. CORPORATION, Intervener, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee.
No. 6227.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Dec. 2, 1931.
Jack F. Hyman, of Dallas, Tex., for appellant.
H. M. Holden, U. S. Atty., and M. S. McCorquodale, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Houston, Tex., for the United States.
Before BRYAN, FOSTER, and SIB-LEY, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — SIBLEY, Circuit Judge.]
SIBLEY, Circuit Judge.
The agreed facts in this case are meager, but the case is substantially identical with those decided this day in Commercial Credit Co. v. United States (C. C. A.) 53 F.(2d) 977. The judgment is accordingly reversed, with direction to dismiss the libel without prejudice.