Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Probate of the Will of James M. Conner, Deceased. Henrietta J. Conner et al., Individually, and as Executors of James M. Conner, Deceased, Appellants, v. Alfred V. Conner et al., Respondents, 1898 — 155 N.Y. 627 · caselaw · US
General
In the Matter of the Probate of the Will of James M. Conner, Deceased. Henrietta J. Conner et al., Individually, and as Executors of James M. Conner, Deceased, Appellants, v. Alfred V. Conner et al., Respondents
155 N.Y. 627·New York Court of Appeals·1898·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Probate of the Will of James M. Conner, Deceased. Henrietta J. Conner et al., Individually, and as Executors of James M. Conner, Deceased, Appellants, v. Alfred V. Conner et al., Respondents.
Matter of Conner, 6 App. Div. 594, affirmed.
(Argued January 11, 1898;
decided January 25, 1898.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered June 29, 1896, affirming a decree of the Surrogate’s Court of the city and county of New York admitting a will to probate.
George W. Stephens for appellants.
William II. Hamilton and S. O. Baldwin for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
All concur.