General
Anna M. Smith, Respondent, v. Richard R. Hull, Appellant
184 N.Y. 534·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Anna M. Smith, Respondent, v. Richard R. Hull, Appellant.
Smith v. Hull, 97 App. Div. 228, affirmed.
(Submitted January 30, 1906;
decided February 13, 1906.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered October 20, 1904, in favor of plaintiff, upon the submission of a controversy under section 1279 of the Oode of Civil Procedure.
William F. Timm for appellant.
Franklin Couch for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Edward T. Bartlett, Werner, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.