Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of U. S. WOOD PRESERVING COMPANY, Bankrupt; American Surety Company of New York, Petitioner, 1925 — 4 F.2d 1023 · caselaw · US
Bankruptcy
In the Matter of U. S. WOOD PRESERVING COMPANY, Bankrupt; American Surety Company of New York, Petitioner
4 F.2d 1023·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1925
Before ROGERS and HOUGH. Circuit Judges, and LEARNED HAND, District Judge.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of U. S. WOOD PRESERVING COMPANY, Bankrupt; American Surety Company of New York, Petitioner.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
January 19, 1925.)
No. 140.
Petition to Revise Order of the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
Henry B. Johnson, of New York City (Ralph Q. Kelly, of New York City, of counsel), for trustees of the bankrupt. Flaherty, Turner & Strouee, of New York City (Louis II. Strouse and Arthur D. Fisher, both of New York City, of counsel), for petitioner.
Before ROGERS and HOUGH. Circuit Judges, and LEARNED HAND, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Order affirmed.