Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Julius Lehman, as Receiver, etc., Respondent, v. George F. Bentley, Appellant, 1892 — 135 N.Y. 651 · caselaw · US
General
Julius Lehman, as Receiver, etc., Respondent, v. George F. Bentley, Appellant
135 N.Y. 651·New York Court of Appeals·1892·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Julius Lehman, as Receiver, etc., Respondent, v. George F. Bentley, Appellant.
(Argued October 11, 1892;
decided October 25, 1892.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Superior Court of the City of Eew York, entered upon an order made May 2, 1892, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff, entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
John B. TJhle for appellant.
John P. WicJces for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.