Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Lillian M. Smith, Respondent, v. Sarah J. Smith, Impleaded, etc., Appellant, 1894 — 142 N.Y. 656 · caselaw · US
General
Lillian M. Smith, Respondent, v. Sarah J. Smith, Impleaded, etc., Appellant
142 N.Y. 656·New York Court of Appeals·1894·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Lillian M. Smith, Respondent, v. Sarah J. Smith, Impleaded, etc., Appellant.
(Submitted April 13, 1894;
decided May 1, 1894.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered upon an order made December 12, 1892, which overruled defendant’s exceptions, denied a motion for a new trial and affirmed an interlocutory judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
George IF. Scmdforcl for appellant.
Thomas I. Mount for respondent L. M. Smith.
IT. 8. AoJ&erly for respondent Brown.
I¿. H. Smith for respondent Phyfe.
Thomas 8. Strong for respondent 0. L. Smith.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.