Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Mary Holroyd, Respondent, v. Thomas Sheridan, Appellant, Impleaded with Another, 1901 — 166 N.Y. 634 · caselaw · US
General
Mary Holroyd, Respondent, v. Thomas Sheridan, Appellant, Impleaded with Another
166 N.Y. 634·New York Court of Appeals·1901·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Mary Holroyd, Respondent, v. Thomas Sheridan, Appellant, Impleaded with Another.
Holroyd v. Sheridan, 53 App. Div. 14, appeal dismissed.
(Argued April 15, 1901;
decided April 23, 1901.)
Motion to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered July 3, 1900, reversing a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term.
The motion was made upon the ground that 'the notice of appeal was not served within sixty days from the date of the service of the order of reversal.
W. C. D. Willson for motion.
Thomas O' Connor opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion granted and appeal dismissed, without costs.