General
Nick BITZILOS and Steve Compulos v. UNITED STATES
4 F.2d 1014·United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·1924
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Nick BITZILOS and Steve Compulos v. UNITED STATES.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
November 14, 1924.)
No. 3947.
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Ohio; John M. Killits, Judge.
Mulholland & Hartmann, of Toledo, Ohio, for plaintiffs in error. George E. Reed, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Toledo, Ohio.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Judgment of the District Court reversed, and cause remanded for a new trial, on authority of U. S. v. Jin Fuey Moy, 241 U. S. 394, 36 S. Ct. 658, 60 L. Ed. 1061, Ann. Cas. 1917D, 854.