General
ARMOUR & COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error, v. Jack MYERS, Defendant in Error
17 F.2d 1008·United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·1926
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
ARMOUR & COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error, v. Jack MYERS, Defendant in Error.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
August 3, 1926.)
No. 7554.
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Missouri.
Jerome Simon, of St. Louis, Mo., for plaintiff in error.
Hay & Flanagan, of St. Louis, Mo., for defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — PEE CURIAM.]
PEE CURIAM.
Writ of error dismissed, at costs of plaintiff in error, per stipulation of parties.