Contracts · MBE-tested

TRAVIA et al. v. LOMENZO, SECRETARY OF STATE OF NEW YORK, et al.

382 U.S. 287·Supreme Court of the United States·1965

Mr. Justice Fortas took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

TRAVIA et al. v. LOMENZO, SECRETARY OF STATE OF NEW YORK, et al. No. 633. Decided December 13, 1965. Simon H. Rif kind, Edward N. Costikyan and Leo A. Larkin for appellants. Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Daniel M. Cohen, Assistant Solicitor General, Donald Zimmerman, Special Assistant Attorney General, George D. Zuckerman, Assistant Attorney General, and Willis Burton Lemon for appellees. [MAJORITY — Per Curiam.] Per Curiam. The judgment is affirmed. [CONCURRENCE — Mr. Justice Harlan] Mr. Justice Harlan concurs in the result for the reasons stated in his acquiescence to the affirmance of the judgment in Travia v. Lomenzo, ante, p. 4, at 8. Mr. Justice Fortas took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.