Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
INTERNATIONAL-GREAT NORTHERN R. CO., Appellant, v. George EDGELEY et al., Appellees; INTERNATIONAL-GREAT NORTHERN R. CO. et al., Appellants, v. TEXAS CO., Appellee, 1925 — 10 F.2d 501 · caselaw · US
General
INTERNATIONAL-GREAT NORTHERN R. CO., Appellant, v. George EDGELEY et al., Appellees; INTERNATIONAL-GREAT NORTHERN R. CO. et al., Appellants, v. TEXAS CO., Appellee
10 F.2d 501·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·1925
Before WALKER, BRYAN, and FOSTER, Circuit Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
INTERNATIONAL-GREAT NORTHERN R. CO., Appellant, v. George EDGELEY et al., Appellees. INTERNATIONAL-GREAT NORTHERN R. CO. et al., Appellants, v. TEXAS CO., Appellee.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
December 1, 1925.
Rehearing Denied January 19, 1926.)
Nos. 4441, 4451.
Appeals from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Texas; Joseph C. Hutcheson, Jr., Judge.
No. 4441:
Samuel B. Dabney, of Houston, Tex. (Walter I'. Woodul, James E. Kilday, and Sam Streetman, all of Houston, Tex., on the brief), for appellant.
John W. Parker, of Houston, Tex., for appellees.
•No. 4451:
Samuel B. Dabney and Sam Streetman, both of Houston, Tex., for appellants.
H. S. Garrett, of Fort Worth, Tex; (C. A. Wilcox, of Austin, Tex., Robt. A. John, of Houston, Tex., and C. B. Ames, of Oklahoma City, Okl., on the brief), for appellee.
Before WALKER, BRYAN, and FOSTER, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — WALKER, Circuit Judge.]
WALKER, Circuit Judge.
In their facts and in the questions raised therein, these two cases are so far like the ease of International-Great Northern R. Co. et al. v. Binford, Sheriff, etc., et al., 10 F.(2d) 496, just decided by this court (United States Circuit Court of Appeals, 5th Circuit, present term), that the opinion rendered in the cited case sufficiently indicates the grounds relied on to support the conclusion reached that the decrees in these two cases should be affirmed.
Those decrees are affirmed.