Skip to main content

Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Peruzovic v. Miley et al.; Christian v. Frank Bommarito Oldsmobile, Inc., dba Bommarito Infinity; Musleve v. Musleve; Warren v. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs; Doe v. Duncan et al.; Dew v. Ohio; Day v. Minnesota et al.; Ellis v. SmithKline Beecham Corp., dba GlaxoSmithKline; Snyder v. United States; Wooten v. California et al.; Mayberry et al. v. Jackson, Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency; Rodriguez-Ayala v. American Express Travel Related Services Co., Inc.; McCord et ux. v. Alabama; Murray v. AT&T Mobility LLC; Shulman v. BlueCross BlueShield of South Carolina; Robertson v. Cree, Inc.; Hernandez-Anguiano v. Holder, Attorney General; Chan v. Department of Justice; Guyton, Executor of the Estate of Guyton v. United States; Robinson v. Holder, Attorney General, 2010 — 562 U.S. 823 · caselaw · US