Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
DuPont v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 1940 — 311 U.S. 657 · caselaw · US
Tax
DuPont v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
311 U.S. 657·Supreme Court of the United States·1940
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 101.
DuPont v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue.
October 14, 1940.
Mr. Percy W. Phillips for petitioner. Solicitor General Biddle, Assistant Attorney General Clark, and Messrs. Sewall Key, J. Louis Monarch, Morton K. Rothschild, and Warner W. Gardner for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals fot the Third Circuit denied,