General
Rose Mullen, an Infant, etc., Appellant, v. Joseph T. Perkins, Respondent
114 N.Y. 615·New York Court of Appeals·1889·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Rose Mullen, an Infant, etc., Appellant, v. Joseph T. Perkins, Respondent.
(Argued March 13, 1889;
decided March 19, 1889.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the City Court of Brooklyn, entered upon an order made the fourth Monday of April, 1888, which affirmed a judgment in favor of defendant, entered upon an offier dismissing the complaint on trial.
Hugo Hirsh for appellant.
Albert G. McDonald for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.