Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Thomas Holloway, Respondent, v. Benjamin F. Stephens, Appellant, 1874 — 58 N.Y. 670 · caselaw · US
General
Thomas Holloway, Respondent, v. Benjamin F. Stephens, Appellant
58 N.Y. 670·New York Court of Appeals·1874·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Thomas Holloway, Respondent, v. Benjamin F. Stephens, Appellant.
(Argued September 22, 1874;
decided September 29, 1874.)
This is an appeal from an order of General Term, affirming ;an order of Special Term directing restitution of property received and collected by defendant under the judgment herein, which was subsequently reversed on appeal. Held, not appealable.’ (Reportedbelow, 1 Hun, 308; 2 N. T. S. C. j[T. & 0.], 562.)
Titus B. Eldridge for the appellant.
John C. Gray for the respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to dismiss appeal. No opinion.
All concur.
Appeal dismissed.