Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
GUARANTY TRUST COMPANY v. METROPOLITAN STREET RAILWAY COMPANY, 1909 — 215 U.S. 587 · caselaw · US
General
GUARANTY TRUST COMPANY v. METROPOLITAN STREET RAILWAY COMPANY
215 U.S. 587·Supreme Court of the United States·1909
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
GUARANTY TRUST COMPANY v. METROPOLITAN STREET RAILWAY COMPANY.
APPEAL FROM THE- CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK.
No. 607.
Motion to dismiss submitted November 8, 1909.
Decided November 15, 1909.
An appeal from the Circuit Court dismissed without opinion on the authority of previous decisions.
Mr. Julien T. Davies, Mr. Brainard Tolies and Mr. John C. Spooner for the appellant.
Mr. ' Arthur H. Masten, Mr. Matthew C. Fleming, Mr. W. M. Chadbourne, Mr. Wm. M. Coleman, Mr. James Byrne and Mr. Frank H. Platt: for the appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Carey v. Houston & Texas Central Railway Co., 150 U. S. 170; In re Lennon, 150 U. S. 393; Cornell v. Green, 163 U. S. 75; Empire State-Idaho Mining & Developing Co. v. Hanley, 205 U. S. 225; Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U. S. 71; Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89; Louisville Trust Co. v. Knott, 191 U. S. 225; United States v. Larkin, 208 U. S. 333; Atlantic Trust Co. v. Chapman, Receiver, 208 U. S. 360; Bien v. Robinson, Receiver, 208 U. S. 423; Delmar Jockey Club v. Missouri, 210 U. S. 324; and see In re Metropolitan Railway Receivership, 208 U. S. 90; Guaranty Trust Co. v. Metropolitan Street Ry. Co., 166 Fed. Rep. 569; 168 Fed. Rep. 937; 170 Fed. Rep. 335; 170 Fed. Rep. 625; 170 Fed. Rep. 626; 171 Fed. Rep. 1014; 171 Fed. Rep. 1015; 171 Fed. Rep. 1019; Morton Trust Co. v. Metropolitan Street Ry. Co., 170 Fed. Rep. 336; Guaranty Trust Co. v. Second Ave. Ry. Co., 171 Fed. Rep. 1020; Pennsylvania Steel Co. v. Metropolitan Street Ry. Co., 170 Fed. Rep. 623.