General
KREZNAR et al. v. UNITED STATES
376 U.S. 22111 L. Ed. 2d 656·Supreme Court of the United States·1964
Mr. Justice Harlan dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Greene v. United States, ante, p. 164.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
KREZNAR et al. v. UNITED STATES.
No. 85.
Decided March 2, 1964.
Sidney Dickstein, David I. Shapiro and George Kauf-mann for petitioners.
Solicitor General Cox, Acting Assistant Attorney General Douglas and Alan S. Rosenthal for the United States.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The petition , for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed. Greene v. United States, ante, p. 149.
Mr. Justice Harlan dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Greene v. United States, ante, p. 164.