General
BINKS MANUFACTURING CO. v. RANSBURG ELECTRO-COATING CORP.
366 U.S. 2116 L. Ed. 2d 239·Supreme Court of the United States·1961
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
BINKS MANUFACTURING CO. v. RANSBURG ELECTRO-COATING CORP.
No. 501.
Argued May 3-4, 1961.
Decided May 8, 1961.
W. Donald McSweeney and Charles F. Meroni argued the cause for petitioner. With them on the briefs were Otto R. Krause and John B. Robinson, Jr.
Elbert R. Gilliom argued the cause for respondent. With him on the briefs were James P. Hume and Harry T. Ice.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger and Richard A. Solomon filed a brief for the United States, as amicus curiae.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
After hearing oral argument and fully examining the record, we conclude that the totality of circumstances as the record makes them manifest did not warrant bringing the case here. Accordingly, the writ is dismissed.