Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY et al. v. WASHINGTON ex rel. YELLOW CAB SERVICE, INC., 1960 — 361 U.S. 373 · caselaw · US
General
SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY et al. v. WASHINGTON ex rel. YELLOW CAB SERVICE, INC.
361 U.S. 3734 L. Ed. 2d 380·Supreme Court of the United States·1960
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY et al. v. WASHINGTON ex rel. YELLOW CAB SERVICE, INC.
No. 76.
Argued January 20, 1960.
Decided January 26, 1960.
Richard P. Donaldson argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief was Samuel B. Bassett.
Kenneth A. Cox argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Herbert S. Little and Warren R. Slemmons.
. Solicitor General Rankin, Stuart Rothman, Thomas J. McDermott, Dominick L. Manoli and Florian J. Bartosic filed a brief for the National Labor Relations Board, as amicus curiae, in support of petitioners;
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The judgment is reversed. San Diego Building Trades Council v. Garmon, 359 U. S. 236.