Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Aero Design & Engineering Co. et al. v. Oklahoma Employment Security Commission et al., 1957 — 353 U.S. 943 · caselaw · US
Securities
Aero Design & Engineering Co. et al. v. Oklahoma Employment Security Commission et al.
353 U.S. 943·Supreme Court of the United States·1957
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
April 29, 1957.
No. 801.
Aero Design & Engineering Co. et al. v. Oklahoma Employment Security Commission et al.
Edward E. Soulé, Robert J. Emery and Edward M. Box for appellants. Mac Q. Williamson, Attorney General of Oklahoma, James C. Harkin, Assistant Attorney General, and Milton R. Elliott for the Oklahoma Employment Security Commission et al., and Harold Cranefield for Abraham, appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The judgment is affirmed.