Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
GERBER and YAGGI v. UHLMANN-STRAUBEL CO., 1933 — 67 F.2d 994 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
GERBER and YAGGI v. UHLMANN-STRAUBEL CO.
67 F.2d 994·United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·1933
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
GERBER and YAGGI v. UHLMANN-STRAUBEL CO.
No. 4966.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
Nov. 17, 1933.
James N. Lorenz, of Chicago, Ill., for appellants.
John T. Chadwell, of Chicago, Ill., for appellee.
Before SPARKS, EITZHENRY, and PAGE, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
This cause came on to be heard on the transcript of the reeord from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, and was argued by counsel.
On consideration whereof, it is now here ordered and adjudged by this court that the judgment of the said District Court in this canse be, and the same is hereby, affirmed, with costs.