Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Louis L. Coudert, as Trustee in Bankruptcy for the Firm of Carley, Rosengarten & Carley, Appellant, v. Samuel M. Jarvis, Respondent, 1907 — 188 N.Y. 584 · caselaw · US
Bankruptcy
Louis L. Coudert, as Trustee in Bankruptcy for the Firm of Carley, Rosengarten & Carley, Appellant, v. Samuel M. Jarvis, Respondent
188 N.Y. 584·New York Court of Appeals·1907·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Louis L. Coudert, as Trustee in Bankruptcy for the Firm of Carley, Rosengarten & Carley, Appellant, v. Samuel M. Jarvis, Respondent.
(Submitted April 2, 1907;
decided April 16, 1907.)
Coudert v. Jarvis, 114 App. Div. 913, affirmed.
Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered. October 20, 1906, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion to transfer the aboverentitled action from the Trial Term to the Special Term calendar.
The following questions were certified :
“I. Whether, on the'facts-shown by the record herein, the cause of action is one maintainable in equity or at law.
“ II. Whether leave should be granted to transfer said action from the Trial Term of said Court to a Special Term thereof, and the motion asking therefor granted.”
W. Benton Crisp for appellant.
nenry W'oilman and Achilles II. Kohn for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs. First question answered “at law; ” second question answered in the negative; no opinion.
Concur : Cullen, Oh. J., O’Brien, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Yann, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.