Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Irene C. Storm, an Infant, by Jaques Van Brunt, her Guardian ad Litem, Appellant, v. T. Schenck Remsen, as Committee of Cornelia L. Bennet, a Lunatic, et al., Respondents, 1899 — 160 N.Y. 693 · caselaw · US
Property · MBE-tested
Irene C. Storm, an Infant, by Jaques Van Brunt, her Guardian ad Litem, Appellant, v. T. Schenck Remsen, as Committee of Cornelia L. Bennet, a Lunatic, et al., Respondents
160 N.Y. 693·New York Court of Appeals·1899·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Irene C. Storm, an Infant, by Jaques Van Brunt, her Guardian ad Litem, Appellant, v. T. Schenck Remsen, as Committee of Cornelia L. Bennet, a Lunatic, et al., Respondents.
(Argued October 5,1899;
decided October 24, 1899.)
Storm, v. Remsen, 11 App. Div. 680, affirmed.
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered December 30, 1896, modifying a judgment entered upon a decision of the court declaring a deed of a testamentary trustee to be void, on trial at Special Term.
Edwin Countryman for appellant.
Hector M. Hitchings and George O. Case for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur.