CLARKE-EMERSON MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Defendant, Appellant, v. REGAL SHOE COMPANY, Plaintiff, Appellee

28 F.2d 1008·United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·1928

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

CLARKE-EMERSON MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Defendant, Appellant, v. REGAL SHOE COMPANY, Plaintiff, Appellee. Circuit Court of Appeals, First Circuit, October 30, 1928. No. 2274. Franklin F. Phillips, of Boston, Mass., for appeEant. George N. Goddard, of Boston, Mass., for appellee. Before BINGHAM, JOHNSON, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. [MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.] PER CURIAM. The only question raised by this appeal is whether the patentee was the inventor of the device, the subject-matter of the patent in suit. In the District Court it was found that he was, and we are of the opinion that the finding should not be disturbed. The decree of. the District Court is affirmed, with costs to the appeEee.