Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People of the State of New York ex rel. John J. Joyce, Appellant, v. Gerard B. Van Wart, Respondent, 1899 — 158 N.Y. 720 · caselaw · US
General
The People of the State of New York ex rel. John J. Joyce, Appellant, v. Gerard B. Van Wart, Respondent
158 N.Y. 720·New York Court of Appeals·1899·NY
All concur.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York ex rel. John J. Joyce, Appellant, v. Gerard B. Van Wart, Respondent.
(Argued March 1, 1899;
decided March 24, 1899.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered January 24, 1899, affirming an order of Special Term denying a motion for a peremptory writ of mandamus to compel the respondent to certify to the comptroller of the city of New York that the relator is an assistant clerk of the Municipal Court of the city of New York for the second district in the borough of Brooklyn, and is entitled to thé salary thereof for the months of February to August, 1898, inclusive.
People ex rel. Joyce v. Van Wart, 36 App. Div. 518, affirmed.
Thomas R. Magner for appellant.
Joseph A. Burr for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs.
Held, that the removal of the assistant clerk did not operate to advance the relator to that position. No opinion.
All concur.