Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
EWING, FEDERAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATOR, v. GARDNER, EXECUTOR, 1951 — 341 U.S. 321 · caselaw · US
Securities
EWING, FEDERAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATOR, v. GARDNER, EXECUTOR
341 U.S. 32195 L. Ed. 2d 968·Supreme Court of the United States·1951
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
EWING, FEDERAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATOR, v. GARDNER, EXECUTOR.
No. 621.
Decided May 7, 1951.
Solicitor General Perlman for petitioner.
Theodore F. Gardner for respondent.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The sole question presented by the petition is the validity of the affirmance by the Court of Appeals of the judgment rendered against the petitioner for costs by the District Court. There being no express statutory authority for the allowance of costs to the respondent, such an award of costs is precluded by 28 U. S. C. § 2412 (a). The judgment of the Court of Appeals, insofar as it relates to the taxation of costs against the petitioner, is therefore reversed.